
+1 for stylish-haskell --- I have it enabled in my save-hook for most of my
patches. It would be good to check in a stylish haskell YAML dotfile into
the repo with some sane/uncontroversial settings (I like the horizontal
alignment but a lot of people don't), then make a one-time pass over the
repo. It will cause merge conflicts on any pending merge request however.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Brent Yorgey
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Ben Millwood
Hi everyone,
Do we have a general notion of what we consider best practices for contributed code to Cabal? Perhaps we should formalise something?
One of the reasons I wanted to get the wiki back online was in the hope that it had some pointers, but it doesn't seem to. (I've started migrating stuff anyway: have a look at https://github.com/haskell/** cabal/wiki/Migration-from-trac< https://github.com/haskell/cabal/wiki/Migration-from-trac>for status).
For example, many of the Cabal modules have explicit, and therefore quite long, import lists, with no clear organisation, and hence when adding new imports I have to read the entire list to make sure they are not already there, and then wonder where makes sense to insert them. Usually I just make something up with no pattern to it, and hence perpetuate the
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:08:35PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: problem.
My experience is that without an automated tool or editor command to organize the headers humans are unlikely to do it. A quick google search didn't turn up any vim or emacs commands for this relating to haskell.
We have
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/stylish%2Dhaskell
which is integrated into Chris Done's extensions to the emacs haskell-mode: https://github.com/haskell/haskell-mode.
-Brent
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
--
Gregory Collins