Re: patch applied (cabal): Implement QA for PackageDescription

On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:39:11PM -0800, Duncan Coutts wrote:

Thu Jan 17 14:36:10 PST 2008 Lennart Kolmodin * Implement QA for PackageDescription Addresses #191 (QA) and #180 (QA for missing license). This patch only adds a new exposed module, it's not yet used anywhere.

I'd prefer that it be called something other than "QA", because it doesn't (and can't) assure quality. Would it make sense to combine this with sanityCheckPackage, possibly with a selectable level of checking, so that all the checks are in one place, and policy can be easily adjusted?