
4 Jul
2015
4 Jul
'15
2:53 a.m.
On 07/03/2015 11:44 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote:
Hi,
On 3 July 2015 at 18:09, Bardur Arantsson
wrote: The checks rely on information which the sub-commands will use (or will have to look up a second time)... hence I want to store it in UseSandbox :).
Yeah, so you can do the check in loadConfigOrSandboxConfig and then put the result of it in the UseSandbox value that you return.
(Sorry, think I did a personal reply instead of reply-to-list. Here it is again for the rest of you...) Exactamundo. I take it there's no objections on the ground of "but UseSandbox MUST ..."? I took that sentinment from your first post. It'll probably be easier to evaluate these things properly when I produce actual pull req's. Regards,