
29 Apr
2010
29 Apr
'10
11:10 a.m.
On 29 Apr 2010, at 13:18, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Stephen Tetley
writes: Thanks. As far as the Cabal file goes - CppHs is LGPL, its in the included README that the GPL distinction is noticed. Possibly this isn't the clearest way of presenting things...
Well, currently Cabal only lets you specify one license, so your options are to either use OtherLicense like Bulat suggested and then specify in the License file what's what, or else do as cpphs does.
I suggest submitting a feature request for Cabal: permit separate licences on each executable stanza. Regards, Malcolm