27 Nov
2006
27 Nov
'06
9:29 a.m.
On 11/27/06, Henning Thielemann
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Isaac Jones wrote:
I anticipate some objections, because some people _hate_ .lhs, but we can see how it goes; in that case, they could always use the user-supplied field to tell cabal layered tools to use the Setup.Foo.Hs or whatever the user wants.
What about a separate binary, say 'cabal-setup', that calls runhaskell Setup.hs ?
Isn't that essentially what 'cabal-setup' is doing now? -- Cheers, Lemmih