#89: Sharing of object files between executable builds? ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: bjorn@… | Owner: blackh Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: normal | Milestone: Cabal-1.8 Component: Cabal library | Version: Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: easy (<4 hours) | Ghcversion: 6.4.2 Platform: Linux | ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by AnttiJuhaniKaijanaho): Replying to [comment:22 duncan]:
For ghc --make you simply get wrong results (it does not track when you change compile options).
Which is relevant in sophisticated cases. I'm concerned that cabal makes simple things more complicated than they need to be.
As a design choice (one made long ago) Cabal lets you specify different compile options for the same source file when used in different components.
What about allowing specifying a list of modules common to all executables? That would help me. (Or, of course, if the "private
Which is a nice thing to have when you need it. libraries" are lightweight enough that I just have to list the modules that are included in it, that's good enough.)
That would be similar though I think I prefer the private library
approach, it's a bit more flexible. The "common modules" approach does not work for sharing modules between a library and an executable with ghc because the module need to be compiled differently. Similarly, I'd like a way to specify compilation options (such as warnings) common to all executables. ... Heh. Should I be opening a separate ticket? :) -- Ticket URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/89#comment:23 Hackage http://haskell.org/cabal/ Hackage: Cabal and related projects