
The implementation in mainline cabal would be more general than what is
currently in cabal-dev. The ticket (#382) mentions ghci but would ideally
implement a 'cabal interact' command that opens whatever interpreter the
user specifies (e.g. hugs instead of ghci).
This would require some refactoring of the way cabal currently handles
compiler options.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Jason Dagit
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Johan Tibell
wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Frank Murphy
wrote: What do people think about seeing this ticket (#212) resolved as part of a SoC project? Is it worthwhile enough to merit consideration?
It might be too small a task to cover the whole summer, depending on the scope you pick. You could combine it with some other tasks, like implementing "cabal ghci" support or some other "Hard" task for the bug tracker.
I've seen a few people requesting 'cabal ghci' lately, and I just want to point out that cabal-dev already has a ghci command. I use it quite often and it's been working well for me. Jason