Re: [Hackage] #37: check to see whether we should be adding symbols to cpphs more often

#37: check to see whether we should be adding symbols to cpphs more often ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: ijones | Owner: ijones Type: task | Status: closed Priority: high | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: Severity: normal | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | Difficulty: normal Ghcversion: 6.2.1 | Platform: Linux ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Changes (by duncan): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Nobody has complained about this for a while. I'll assume we're passing enough flags now. It looks like we pass the same flags for cpp or cpphs. If we're still missing some please open a new bug and provide details. -- Ticket URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/37#comment:4 Hackage http://haskell.org/cabal/ Hackage: Cabal and related projects
participants (1)
-
Hackage