Trac import is complete - cabal-devel - Haskell.org

newer
cabal-install-ghc74 fixes

Trac import is complete

older
Re: [Hackage] #282: profiling...

Bryan O'Sullivan

24 May 2012 24 May '12

2:14 a.m.

You can now find open issues here: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues?state=open Duncan or Andres, could one of you please chmod -w the files owned by Trac, and add a note pointing people to github for filing bugs?

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 311 bytes)

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Andres Löh

24 May 24 May

2:43 a.m.

Hi Bryan. First of all, thanks. It looks great. On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

You can now find open issues here: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues?state=open

Duncan or Andres, could one of you please chmod -w the files owned by Trac, and add a note pointing people to github for filing bugs?

Sorry for noting this only once I go through the Wiki page. The difficulty level has not been converted? It's not terribly important, but we've used it in the past to point interested newcomers to supposedly "easy" tasks. If it's a lot of work to change now, then don't. But perhaps it could be done by just modifying the already converted tickets in one batch process and adding new tags? I have tried to delete ticket modification permissions for authenticated users in the trac. I'm hesitating to change the file permissions, as we'll probably still want to use the Wiki for now. I changed the pointers on the Trac main page and on haskell.org/cabal -- there are probably other references elsewhere. If you know of anything important that should be changed, please let me know. Cheers, Andres -- Andres Löh, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Bryan O'Sullivan

1:12 p.m.

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Andres Löh wrote:

Sorry for noting this only once I go through the Wiki page. The difficulty level has not been converted? It's not terribly important, but we've used it in the past to point interested newcomers to supposedly "easy" tasks.

I could do that, but it might be as fast to do it by hand as to write a script for the job.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Ben Millwood

10:49 a.m.

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

You can now find open issues here: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues?state=open

Duncan or Andres, could one of you please chmod -w the files owned by Trac, and add a note pointing people to github for filing bugs?

_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel

At least one of the ticket cross-references has gone wrong: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/653 I refer to #719 in this ticket, which links to github issue #719, but that's Trac ticket #729. I wanted the ticket imported from Trac #719, i.e. this one https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/710

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Andres Löh

25 May 25 May

2:48 a.m.

Hi Ben and Bryan.

At least one of the ticket cross-references has gone wrong:

https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/653

I refer to #719 in this ticket, which links to github issue #719, but that's Trac ticket #729. I wanted the ticket imported from Trac #719, i.e. this one https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/710

I can confirm that. I've checked a number of cross-references in cabal-install bugs, and afaics, they're all(?) wrong. Cheers, Andres -- Andres Löh, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Bryan O'Sullivan

12:49 p.m.

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Andres Löh wrote:

I can confirm that. I've checked a number of cross-references in cabal-install bugs, and afaics, they're all(?) wrong.

Ugh. I'll see if I can find time to write a script to fix up the cross references.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Johan Tibell

12:56 p.m.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

Ugh. I'll see if I can find time to write a script to fix up the cross references.

Is the problem due to there already being some issue reports in the repo and thus all the Trac tickets got offset by some number?

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Andres Löh

12:59 p.m.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

...
Ugh. I'll see if I can find time to write a script to fix up the cross references.

Is the problem due to there already being some issue reports in the repo and thus all the Trac tickets got offset by some number?

My speculation would be that some Trac tickets don't exist because they have been deleted, and then these don't get converted, and this introduces an offset. Cheers, Andres -- Andres Löh, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Ben Millwood

26 May 26 May

5:28 a.m.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andres Löh wrote:

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:

...
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

...
Ugh. I'll see if I can find time to write a script to fix up the cross references.

Is the problem due to there already being some issue reports in the repo and thus all the Trac tickets got offset by some number?

My speculation would be that some Trac tickets don't exist because they have been deleted, and then these don't get converted, and this introduces an offset.

Yeah, I think this is more likely, since it seems like not all of the cross-references are off by the same amount. github issue #719 is trac #729, but github issue #410 is trac #417.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Bryan O'Sullivan

28 May 28 May

12:49 a.m.

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Ben Millwood wrote:

Yeah, I think this is more likely, since it seems like not all of the cross-references are off by the same amount. github issue #719 is trac #729, but github issue #410 is trac #417.

I'll get around to fixing this at some point, but this is the second bug tracker migration I've done in the past few weeks, and I need a break :-)

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Bryan O'Sullivan

25 May 25 May

12:59 p.m.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:

Is the problem due to there already being some issue reports in the repo and thus all the Trac tickets got offset by some number?

Possibly. I thought I had some code in there to fix that up, but I guess it didn't do its thing.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Duncan Coutts

24 May 24 May

1:06 p.m.

On 23 May 2012 23:14, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

You can now find open issues here: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues?state=open

Haven't had time to look at it yet (on the road atm) but I just wanted to say a big thank you Bryan for all the hard work!

Duncan or Andres, could one of you please chmod -w the files owned by Trac, and add a note pointing people to github for filing bugs?

Will do when I get back (unless Andres beats me to it) Duncan

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

4740

Age (days ago)

4744

Last active (days ago)

Download

11 comments

5 participants

tags

participants (5)

Andres Löh
Ben Millwood
Bryan O'Sullivan
Duncan Coutts
Johan Tibell