patch applied (cabal): Change --configure-option= to --configure-arg=

Sat Sep 1 17:33:34 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts

On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:33:26PM -0700, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Sat Sep 1 17:33:34 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts
* Change --configure-option= to --configure-arg= For consitency with other flags.
Also --ghc-option for build and makefile. These are used by GHC only; I wonder if the configure option would be a substitute. I forgot that the file format includes XXX-options fields, which might be a source of confusion.

On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 01:53 +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:33:26PM -0700, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Sat Sep 1 17:33:34 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts
* Change --configure-option= to --configure-arg= For consitency with other flags. Also --ghc-option for build and makefile. These are used by GHC only; I wonder if the configure option would be a substitute.
Or configure's --ghc-arg flag. I'll ask Ian if we still need those build/makefile --ghc-option flags.
I forgot that the file format includes XXX-options fields, which might be a source of confusion.
Mm, good point. We can't change those of course. What do you think we should do? Duncan

On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:56:45PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 01:53 +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:33:26PM -0700, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Sat Sep 1 17:33:34 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts
* Change --configure-option= to --configure-arg= For consitency with other flags. Also --ghc-option for build and makefile. These are used by GHC only; I wonder if the configure option would be a substitute.
Or configure's --ghc-arg flag. I'll ask Ian if we still need those build/makefile --ghc-option flags.
Sorry, that's what I meant.
I forgot that the file format includes XXX-options fields, which might be a source of confusion.
Mm, good point. We can't change those of course. What do you think we should do?
I think it argues for --PROG-option(s). The -args options weren't documented, so they didn't exist.

On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 14:09 +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
I forgot that the file format includes XXX-options fields, which might be a source of confusion.
Mm, good point. We can't change those of course. What do you think we should do?
I think it argues for --PROG-option(s). The -args options weren't documented, so they didn't exist.
Right. Duncan
participants (2)
-
Duncan Coutts
-
Ross Paterson