Re: [Hackage] #98: cabal assumes -x option for linking

#98: cabal assumes -x option for linking ---------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: Christian.Maeder@dfki.de | Owner: ijones Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Cabal-1.2 Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.0 Severity: normal | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | Difficulty: easy (<4 hours) Ghcversion: 6.6 | Platform: Other Unix ---------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by duncan): Replying to [comment:16 guest]:
We have Solaris 10, you're program outputs the value 1048320, too. However, my problem was about the xargs -s value. So draw your own conclusions from my output below. Cheers Christian
Thanks very much Christian, that's great. I don't think us cabal hackers
realised it was just `xargs` the unix program that had the limit and
assumed it was the process limit. There's also an `xargs` function in
cabal and we mistakenly applied the limit to that too:
{{{
Thu Oct 18 15:05:00 BST 2007 Simon Marlow
participants (1)
-
Hackage