Fri Dec 19 13:59:22 PST 2008 Duncan Coutts <duncan@haskell.org> * Use a more precise package substitution test in improvePlan This is where we take a valid plan and we "improve" it by swapping installed packages for available packages wherever possible. This change is to the condition we use in deciding if it is safe to use the installed package in place of a reinstall. Previously we checked that the dependencies of the installed version were exactly the same as the dependencies we were planning to reinstall with. That was valid but rather conservative. It caused problems in some situations where the installed package did not exactly match the available package (eg when using development versions of a package or of ghc). What we do now is test if the extra constraints implied by selecting the installed version are consistent with the existing set of constraints. This involves threading the constraint set around. In theory this should even cope with adding additional packages to the plan as a result of selecting an installed package. M ./Distribution/Client/Dependency/TopDown.hs -19 +47 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/cabal-install/_darcs/patches/20081219215922-adfee-1...