patch applied (cabal-branches/cabal-1.2): spell nhc98-options correctly
Thu Sep 6 08:04:11 PDT 2007 Malcolm.Wallace@cs.york.ac.uk * spell nhc98-options correctly M ./Cabal.cabal -1 +1
I'd assume these patches get applied in batches (e.g., many in a
single command). Is there any way these emails can reduced to one per
batch, instead of one per patch?
Pete
On 9/6/07, Duncan Coutts
Thu Sep 6 08:04:11 PDT 2007 Malcolm.Wallace@cs.york.ac.uk * spell nhc98-options correctly
M ./Cabal.cabal -1 +1 _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:03 -0400, Peter Gavin wrote:
I'd assume these patches get applied in batches (e.g., many in a single command). Is there any way these emails can reduced to one per batch, instead of one per patch?
It was done this way deliberately at the time that patches were going to the libraries commit mailing list. It does make somewhat less sense now that the emails are going to cabal-devel. What do other people think? Duncan
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:00:49PM +0000, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:03 -0400, Peter Gavin wrote:
I'd assume these patches get applied in batches (e.g., many in a single command). Is there any way these emails can reduced to one per batch, instead of one per patch?
It was done this way deliberately at the time that patches were going to the libraries commit mailing list. It does make somewhat less sense now that the emails are going to cabal-devel.
What do other people think?
I prefer a separate mail per patch. I don't mind which list it goes to, as long as it is only 1 list. Thanks Ian
participants (3)
-
Duncan Coutts -
Ian Lynagh -
Peter Gavin