Hi all, Given that I'm often quite annoyed by the almost-total lack of support for developing a set of coherent libraries together in a convenient fashion[1] using Cabal, I'd like to ask a) are there any current plans or GitHub issues on implementing any support for this workflow that I should be aware of? b) are there any wiki pages (or similar) detailing any requirements that people might have for this type of workflow? c) would there be *interest* in somebody (e.g. me) implementing support for such a workflow? d) if "yes" to c), how should one go about it? What kind of consensus needs to gathered and whom do I need to convince of the brilliance of this idea? I should note that I have *very* little experience with Cabal/cabal-install's code (a couple of pretty trivial patches, I think), but it's Haskell, so how bad could it be, right? I have a week's vacation coming up next week (and probably a few more a little later in the summer), and I think I may be able to dedicate quite a bit of time to getting this done, *but*... if I'm going to spend that time, I want something that can be integrated into cabal-install *and* I want something that has a reasonable chance of actually getting merged. (Of course, I don't expect bad code to be merged, but I'm quite happy to fix bad code whenever it's pointed out to me.) Otherwise, I'll just keep using cobbled-together one-off Python scripts (and terribly inefficient workflows)... and complaining constantly about it :). So... how can get this ball rolling? Regards, [1] E.g. I have a set of cqrs-* libraries + demo executable packages in a single git repository, each with their own subdirectory and .cabal file. These libraries may depend on each other in arbitrary non-circular ways and I want to be able to conveniently build all of it in the appropriate order and with a consistent set of dependencies in a single sandbox.