26 Apr
2006
26 Apr
'06
2:47 p.m.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:42:58PM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Does this harm gcc?
I'm afraid it does: the arguments are usually C files and -l options for libraries, and the libraries are scanned in the order they appear. Put them too early, and it fails to find a symbol defined in a later file. Perhaps we should make it vary.
What if we move the -o option before the filename? Then there won't usually be a warning, which is better.
That would be fine.