
"Ross Paterson"
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:20:49AM -0800, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
Thanks Ross,
looks good, but the maintainer section is out-of-date. I've hardly touched Hugs since March, so having you down as "The Maintainer" would now be correct, really.
That wouldn't be accurate either. There are large chunks of Hugs (module system, static analysis, compilation, abstract machine) that I hardly dare touch. Maybe we should be open about this.
I think you deserve to be credited for the work you've put into Hugs & have your name up in lights as the maintainer, hence my suggestion. But if you feel that assigns too much responsibility on you for keeping the system healthy, dark corners and all, that's allright. I'm just as happy to have it be labelled as maintained by "Friends of Hugs" (or some such) and leave individuals out of it alltogether. But, if you want the Hugs maintainer token (a real stone token contributed by Andy Gill a couple of years back), it's yours. And, no, it's not a millstone :-) --sigbjorn