17 Oct
2003
17 Oct
'03
10:21 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:26:50PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
No, I wouldn't recommend that as printed documentation is still best handled via docbook-utils & jade rather than docbook-xsl (unless someone has happy (&stable) stories to tell re: XSL-FO processing..)
What to do? I believe jade will complain, but continue, if xref's are closed using </xref>, so that's a hacky way out.
How about a simple %.xml: %.sgml rule in the Makefile (with something special for the root)?