30 Oct
2005
30 Oct
'05
3:05 p.m.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:59:16PM +0000, Neil Mitchell wrote:
This differs from setArgs in that it leave the args set. Maybe the command should just set the args.
From what I can tell, setArgs leaves the arguments set, but withArgs doesn't because with changes the arguments back after the computation has run. My initial thought was to revert the arguments back afterwards, but it wasn't immediately clear how to do this - because of things like longjmp.
Sorry, I meant withArgs -- setArgs is internal. But instead of resetting, how about making setting the args the whole function of the new command, so then they can run main (or anything else) several times with the same argument? (I'm not sure what WinHugs interface you had in mind.)