Re: cvs commit: hugs98 Readme hugs98/docs hugs.1.in hugs98/docs/users_guide hugs_ghc.sgml introduction.sgml running.sgml hugs98/src Makefile.in input.c opts.c opts.h parser.y hugs98/src/unix hugs-package.in test_libraries hugs98/tests ...

19 Sep 2003

      On Friday, September 19, 2003, at 02:02 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
...
...
ross        2003/09/18 11:02:25 PDT
Modified files:
    .                    Readme
    docs                 hugs.1.in
    docs/users_guide     hugs_ghc.sgml introduction.sgml
                         running.sgml
    src                  Makefile.in input.c opts.c opts.h
                         parser.y
    src/unix             hugs-package.in test_libraries
    tests                testScript
  Log:
  Remove the obsolete dlet/with syntax, and the +/-W option.
Should we do this in GHC too?  For 6.2 maybe?
I'd love to see it stay, because it is syntactically oh-so-much-nicer 
than `let' in practice.

However, having lost that battle previously (albeit for the wrong 
reasons, of course ;-), I can't think of a good reason to keep it.  And 
besides, it bugs Sven, so lets take it out of GHC (for 6.2) as well.

--Jeff

Re: cvs commit: hugs98 Readme hugs98/docs hugs.1.in hugs98/docs/users_guide hugs_ghc.sgml introduction.sgml running.sgml hugs98/src Makefile.in input.c opts.c opts.h parser.y hugs98/src/unix hugs-package.in test_libraries hugs98/tests ...

Jeffrey R Lewis