cvs commit: hugs98/docs/users_guide haskell98.sgml hugs_ghc.sgml introduction.sgml options.sgml using_hugs.sgml
sof 2003/10/17 16:41:39 PDT
Modified files:
docs/users_guide haskell98.sgml hugs_ghc.sgml
introduction.sgml options.sgml
using_hugs.sgml
Log:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:41:39PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
sof 2003/10/17 16:41:39 PDT
Modified files: docs/users_guide haskell98.sgml hugs_ghc.sgml introduction.sgml options.sgml using_hugs.sgml Log:
~=>
Unfortunately if you run `docbook2html using_hugs.sgml', this leaves spurious >'s in the output. Should we just switch them all to .xml?
No, I wouldn't recommend that as printed documentation is still best handled via docbook-utils & jade rather than docbook-xsl (unless someone has happy (&stable) stories to tell re: XSL-FO processing..) What to do? I believe jade will complain, but continue, if xref's are closed using </xref>, so that's a hacky way out. --sigbjorn Ross Paterson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:41:39PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
sof 2003/10/17 16:41:39 PDT
Modified files: docs/users_guide haskell98.sgml hugs_ghc.sgml introduction.sgml options.sgml using_hugs.sgml Log:
~=> Unfortunately if you run `docbook2html using_hugs.sgml', this leaves spurious >'s in the output. Should we just switch them all to .xml? _______________________________________________ Cvs-hugs mailing list Cvs-hugs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-hugs
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:26:50PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
No, I wouldn't recommend that as printed documentation is still best handled via docbook-utils & jade rather than docbook-xsl (unless someone has happy (&stable) stories to tell re: XSL-FO processing..)
What to do? I believe jade will complain, but continue, if xref's are closed using </xref>, so that's a hacky way out.
How about a simple %.xml: %.sgml rule in the Makefile (with something special for the root)?
participants (3)
-
Ross Paterson -
Sigbjorn Finne -
Sigbjorn Finne