Ian Lynagh wrote:
The specification of nullPtr looks to me like it is not necessarily the same as NULL in C. Is this intentional?
I don't think so: 0 resp. NULL is the only "special" pointer value in C/C++ IIRC, so this should be clarified => Manuel? Cheers, S. -- Sven Panne Fon: +49/89/99567000 Fax: +49/89/99567461 BetaResearch GmbH, Betastr. 1, D-85774 Unterfoehring mailto:Sven_Panne@BetaResearch.de http://www.betaresearch.de
Sven Panne <Sven_Panne@BetaResearch.de> wrote,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
The specification of nullPtr looks to me like it is not necessarily the same as NULL in C. Is this intentional?
I don't think so: 0 resp. NULL is the only "special" pointer value in C/C++ IIRC, so this should be clarified => Manuel?
Agreed. (We'll put an explicit statement in somewhere.) Manuel
participants (2)
-
Manuel M T Chakravarty -
Sven Panne