DLL spec [ was: FFI Report, CVS Id 1.5 ]
Manuel wrote:
[...] I'd prefer to complicate the ccall entity description slightly and go for
foreign import ccall "myheader.h foo@mylib" foo :: Int -> Int
[...] Any objections?
I'd favour this, too. Just a very minor note: If there is a "::"-syntax for this already on .NET, we should adopt this instead of "@". I'm not sure about this or similar lexical conventions on other platforms, though. Cheers, Sven -- Sven Panne Fon: +49/89/99567000 Fax: +49/89/99567461 BetaResearch GmbH, Betastr. 1, D-85774 Unterfoehring mailto:Sven_Panne@BetaResearch.de http://www.betaresearch.de
On 18-Jun-2001, Sven Panne <Sven_Panne@BetaResearch.de> wrote:
Manuel wrote:
[...] I'd prefer to complicate the ccall entity description slightly and go for
foreign import ccall "myheader.h foo@mylib" foo :: Int -> Int
[...] Any objections?
I'd favour this, too. Just a very minor note: If there is a "::"-syntax for this already on .NET, we should adopt this instead of "@". I'm not sure about this or similar lexical conventions on other platforms, though.
.NET is a runtime platform, it doesn't really have any syntax. There is a convention for using "." for namespace separators that is pretty much baked into the system. But apart from that, there's no syntax save what programming languages decide upon. -- Tyson Dowd # # Surreal humour isn't everyone's cup of fur. trd@cs.mu.oz.au # http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #
participants (2)
-
Sven Panne -
Tyson Dowd