Sean Leather wrote:
Hi Daneel,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 13:58, Daneel Yaitskov wrote:
Recently I've found wonderful thing cabal can install packages itself! It can even install those packages which need for final one. But I'm disturbed cabal doesn't create the documentation of a package by default. It manually makes "runhaskell Setup haddock".
Who knows?
I believe you can do 'cabal haddock', but I don't know why it doesn't do it by default.
BTW, the Haskell Café is typically more suitable for questions such as these. The Generics list is more specifically for generic programming discussions while the Haskell Café serves a broader audience. I've CC'd haskell-cafe@ to see if anybody there knows the answer to your question.
Regards, Sean
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
I afraid you wrong understood my situation. It is so: cabal installs a package only by it's name. I don't explicitly download the archive with a package and don't extract it. Therefore there isn't any context for the "cabal haddock" command. For example, I write "cabal install htx" command in the home directory and it download and install bulk of complementary packages with htx package from the web-site. After so as this work will finish nothing leave itself. The home directory will be same. But I can't write install htx and haddock simultaneously :(. Daneel Yaitskov