Simon Peyton Jones pushed to branch wip/T26315 at Glasgow Haskell Compiler / GHC
Commits:
84622fb0 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2025-09-11T14:11:52+01:00
Solve forall-constraints via an implication, again
In this earlier commit:
commit 953fd8f1dc080f1c56e3a60b4b7157456949be29
Author: Simon Peyton Jones
Date: Mon Jul 21 10:06:43 2025 +0100
Solve forall-constraints immediately, or not at all
I used a all-or-nothing strategy for quantified constraints
(aka forall-constraints). But alas that fell foul of #26315,
and #26376.
So this MR goes back to solving a quantified constraint by
turning it into an implication; UNLESS we are simplifying
constraints from a SPECIALISE pragma, in which case the
all-or-nothing strategy is great. See:
Note [Solving a Wanted forall-constraint]
Other stuff in this MR:
* TcSMode becomes a record of flags, rather than an enumeration
type; much nicer.
* Some fancy footwork to avoid error messages worsening again
(The above MR made them better; we want to retain that.)
See `GHC.Tc.Errors.Ppr.pprQCOriginExtra`.
- - - - -
de2e7080 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2025-09-11T14:11:52+01:00
Add a test case for #26396
...same bug ast #26315
- - - - -
46 changed files:
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Binds.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Deriv/Utils.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Errors/Ppr.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Gen/Sig.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Default.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Dict.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Equality.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/InertSet.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Monad.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Solve.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Solve.hs-boot
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Types/Constraint.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Types/Evidence.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Types/Origin.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/Monad.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Zonk/TcType.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Zonk/Type.hs
- testsuite/tests/backpack/should_fail/bkpfail11.stderr
- testsuite/tests/backpack/should_fail/bkpfail43.stderr
- + testsuite/tests/deriving/should_compile/T26396.hs
- testsuite/tests/deriving/should_compile/all.T
- testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T12768.stderr
- testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T1496.stderr
- testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T21302.stderr
- testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T22696b.stderr
- testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5498.stderr
- testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T7148.stderr
- testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T7148a.stderr
- testsuite/tests/impredicative/T17332.stderr
- testsuite/tests/quantified-constraints/T19690.stderr
- testsuite/tests/quantified-constraints/T19921.stderr
- testsuite/tests/quantified-constraints/T21006.stderr
- testsuite/tests/roles/should_fail/RolesIArray.stderr
- testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/DsSpecPragmas.hs
- testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/DsSpecPragmas.stderr
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T14434.hs
- + testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T26376.hs
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/all.T
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T15801.stderr
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T19627.stderr
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T20666.stderr
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T20666a.stderr
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T20666b.stderr
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T22912.stderr
- testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T23427.stderr
The diff was not included because it is too large.
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/674f97ccb9db7d4ae1399e843af5a77...
--
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/674f97ccb9db7d4ae1399e843af5a77...
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org.
