Simon Peyton Jones pushed to branch wip/T26115 at Glasgow Haskell Compiler / GHC Commits: f8d9d016 by Andrew Lelechenko at 2025-07-22T21:13:28-04:00 Fix issues with toRational for types capable to represent infinite and not-a-number values This commit fixes all of the following pitfalls:

toRational (read "Infinity" :: Double) 179769313486231590772930519078902473361797697894230657273430081157732675805500963132708477322407536021120113879871393357658789768814416622492847430639474124377767893424865485276302219601246094119453082952085005768838150682342462881473913110540827237163350510684586298239947245938479716304835356329624224137216 % 1 toRational (read "NaN" :: Double) 269653970229347386159395778618353710042696546841345985910145121736599013708251444699062715983611304031680170819807090036488184653221624933739271145959211186566651840137298227914453329401869141179179624428127508653257226023513694322210869665811240855745025766026879447359920868907719574457253034494436336205824 % 1

realToFrac (read "NaN" :: Double) -- With -O0 Infinity realToFrac (read "NaN" :: Double) -- With -O1 NaN

realToFrac (read "NaN" :: Double) :: CDouble Infinity realToFrac (read "NaN" :: CDouble) :: Double Infinity

Implements https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/338 - - - - - 5dabc718 by Zubin Duggal at 2025-07-22T21:14:10-04:00 haddock: Don't warn about missing link destinations for derived names. Fixes #26114 - - - - - 9c3a0937 by Matthew Pickering at 2025-07-22T21:14:52-04:00 template haskell: use a precise condition when implicitly lifting Implicit lifting corrects a level error by replacing references to `x` with `$(lift x)`, therefore you can use a level `n` binding at level `n + 1`, if it can be lifted. Therefore, we now have a precise check that the use level is 1 more than the bind level. Before this bug was not observable as you only had 0 and 1 contexts but it is easily evident when using explicit level imports. Fixes #26088 - - - - - 5144b22f by Andreas Klebinger at 2025-07-22T21:15:34-04:00 Add since tag and more docs for do-clever-arg-eta-expansion Fixes #26113 - - - - - c865623b by Andreas Klebinger at 2025-07-22T21:15:34-04:00 Add since tag for -fexpose-overloaded-unfoldings Fixes #26112 - - - - - 49a44ab7 by Simon Hengel at 2025-07-23T17:59:55+07:00 Refactor GHC.Driver.Errors.printMessages - - - - - 84711c39 by Simon Hengel at 2025-07-23T18:27:34+07:00 Respect `-fdiagnostics-as-json` for error messages from pre-processors (fixes #25480) - - - - - d046b5ab by Simon Hengel at 2025-07-24T06:12:05-04:00 Include the rendered message in -fdiagnostics-as-json output This implements #26173. - - - - - d2b89603 by Ben Gamari at 2025-07-24T06:12:47-04:00 rts/Interpreter: Factor out ctoi tuple info tables into data Instead of a massive case let's put this into data which we can reuse elsewhere. - - - - - 4bc78496 by Sebastian Graf at 2025-07-24T16:19:34-04:00 CprAnal: Detect recursive newtypes (#25944) While `cprTransformDataConWork` handles recursive data con workers, it did not detect the case when a newtype is responsible for the recursion. This is now detected in the `Cast` case of `cprAnal`. The same reproducer made it clear that `isRecDataCon` lacked congruent handling for `AppTy` and `CastTy`, now fixed. Furthermore, the new repro case T25944 triggered this bug via an infinite loop in `cprFix`, caused by the infelicity in `isRecDataCon`. While it should be much less likely to trigger such an infinite loop now that `isRecDataCon` has been fixed, I made sure to abort the loop after 10 iterations and emitting a warning instead. Fixes #25944. - - - - - 0a583689 by Sylvain Henry at 2025-07-24T16:20:26-04:00 STM: don't create a transaction in the rhs of catchRetry# (#26028) We don't need to create a transaction for the rhs of (catchRetry#) because contrary to the lhs we don't need to abort it on retry. Moreover it is particularly harmful if we have code such as (#26028): let cN = readTVar vN >> retry tree = c1 `orElse` (c2 `orElse` (c3 `orElse` ...)) atomically tree Because it will stack transactions for the rhss and the read-sets of all the transactions will be iteratively merged in O(n^2) after the execution of the most nested retry. - - - - - a49eca26 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2025-07-25T09:49:58+01:00 Renaming around predicate types .. we were (as it turned out) abstracting over type-class selectors in SPECIALISATION rules! Wibble isEqPred - - - - - f80375dd by Simon Peyton Jones at 2025-07-25T09:49:58+01:00 Refactor of Specialise.hs This patch just tidies up `specHeader` a bit, removing one of its many results, and adding some comments. No change in behaviour. Also add a few more `HasDebugCallStack` contexts. - - - - - 1bd12371 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2025-07-25T09:49:58+01:00 Improve treatment of SPECIALISE pragmas -- again! This MR does another major refactor of the way that SPECIALISE pragmas work, to fix #26115, #26116, #26117. * We now /always/ solve forall-constraints in an all-or-nothing way. See Note [Solving a Wanted forall-constraint] in GHC.Tc.Solver.Solve This means we might have unsolved quantified constraints, which need to be reported. See `inert_insts` in `getUnsolvedInerts`. * I refactored the short-cut solver for type classes to work by recursively calling the solver rather than by having a little baby solver that kept being not clever enough. See Note [Shortcut solving] in GHC.Tc.Solver.Dict * I totally rewrote the desugaring of SPECIALISE pragmas, again. The new story is in Note [Desugaring new-form SPECIALISE pragmas] in GHC.HsToCore.Binds Both old-form and new-form SPECIALISE pragmas now route through the same function `dsSpec_help`. The tricky function `decomposeRuleLhs` is now used only for user-written RULES, not for SPECIALISE pragmas. * I improved `solveOneFromTheOther` to account for rewriter sets. Previously it would solve a non-rewritten dict from a rewritten one. For equalities we were already dealing with this, in Some incidental refactoring * A small refactor: `ebv_tcvs` in `EvBindsBar` now has a list of coercions, rather than a set of tyvars. We just delay taking the free vars. * GHC.Core.FVs.exprFVs now returns /all/ free vars. Use `exprLocalFVs` for Local vars. Reason: I wanted another variant for /evidence/ variables. * Ues `EvId` in preference to `EvVar`. (Evidence variables are always Ids.) Rename `isEvVar` to `isEvId`. * I moved `inert_safehask` out of `InertCans` and into `InertSet` where it more properly belongs. Compiler-perf changes: * There was a palpable bug (#26117) which this MR fixes in newWantedEvVar, which bypassed all the subtle overlapping-Given and shortcutting logic. (See the new `newWantedEvVar`.) Fixing this but leads to extra dictionary bindings; they are optimised away quickly but they made CoOpt_Read allocate 3.6% more. * Hpapily T15164 improves. * The net compiler-allocation change is 0.0% Metric Decrease: T15164 Metric Increase: CoOpt_Read T12425 - - - - - 953fd8f1 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2025-07-25T09:49:58+01:00 Solve forall-constraints immediately, or not at all This MR refactors the constraint solver to solve forall-constraints immediately, rather than emitting an implication constraint to be solved later. The most immediate motivation was that when solving quantified constraints in SPECIALISE pragmas, we really really don't want to leave behind half- solved implications. Also it's in tune with the approach of the new short-cut solver, which recursively invokes the solver. It /also/ saves quite a bit of plumbing; e.g - The `wl_implics` field of `WorkList` is gone, - The types of `solveSimpleWanteds` and friends are simplified. - An EvFun contains binding, rather than an EvBindsVar ref-cell that will in the future contain bindings. That makes `evVarsOfTerm` simpler. Much nicer. It also improves error messages a bit. All described in Note [Solving a Wanted forall-constraint] in GHC.Tc.Solver.Solve. One tiresome point: in the tricky case of `inferConstraintsCoerceBased` we make a forall-constraint. This we /do/ want to partially solve, so we can infer a suitable context. (I'd be quite happy to force the user to write a context, bt I don't want to change behavior.) So we want to generate an /implication/ constraint in `emitPredSpecConstraints` rather than a /forall-constraint/ as we were doing before. Discussed in (WFA3) of the above Note. Incidental refactoring * `GHC.Tc.Deriv.Infer.inferConstraints` was consulting the state monad for the DerivEnv that the caller had just consulted. Nicer to pass it as an argument I think, so I have done that. No change in behaviour. - - - - - 6921ab42 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2025-07-25T09:49:58+01:00 Remove duplicated code in Ast.hs for evTermFreeVars This is just a tidy up. - - - - - 1165f587 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2025-07-25T09:49:58+01:00 Small tc-tracing changes only - - - - - 114 changed files: - compiler/GHC/Core.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/FVs.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Make.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Arity.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/CprAnal.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/Specialise.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Predicate.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Rules.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Subst.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/Rep.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Unfold/Make.hs - compiler/GHC/Core/Utils.hs - compiler/GHC/Driver/Errors.hs - compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Binds.hs - compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Errors/Ppr.hs - compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Pmc/Solver/Types.hs - compiler/GHC/Iface/Ext/Ast.hs - compiler/GHC/Rename/Splice.hs - compiler/GHC/SysTools/Process.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Deriv.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Deriv/Infer.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Deriv/Utils.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Errors.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Errors/Ppr.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Gen/App.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Gen/Expr.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Gen/Pat.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Gen/Sig.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Default.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Dict.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Equality.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/InertSet.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Monad.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Rewrite.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Solve.hs - + compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Solve.hs-boot - compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Types.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/TyCl/PatSyn.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Types/Constraint.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Types/Evidence.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Types/Origin.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/Monad.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/TcMType.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/TcType.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/Unify.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Validity.hs - compiler/GHC/Tc/Zonk/Type.hs - compiler/GHC/Types/Error.hs - compiler/GHC/Types/Var.hs - compiler/GHC/Utils/Logger.hs - docs/users_guide/9.14.1-notes.rst - + docs/users_guide/diagnostics-as-json-schema-1_2.json - docs/users_guide/using-optimisation.rst - docs/users_guide/using.rst - ghc/GHCi/UI.hs - libraries/base/changelog.md - libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/Float.hs - libraries/ghc-internal/src/GHC/Internal/Real.hs - rts/Interpreter.c - rts/PrimOps.cmm - rts/RaiseAsync.c - rts/STM.c - + testsuite/tests/cpranal/sigs/T25944.hs - + testsuite/tests/cpranal/sigs/T25944.stderr - testsuite/tests/cpranal/sigs/all.T - testsuite/tests/deriving/should_compile/T20815.hs - testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T12768.stderr - testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T1496.stderr - testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5498.stderr - testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T7148.stderr - testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T7148a.stderr - testsuite/tests/driver/json.stderr - testsuite/tests/driver/json_warn.stderr - testsuite/tests/haddock/haddock_testsuite/Makefile - + testsuite/tests/haddock/haddock_testsuite/T26114.hs - + testsuite/tests/haddock/haddock_testsuite/T26114.stdout - testsuite/tests/haddock/haddock_testsuite/all.T - testsuite/tests/hiefile/should_run/HieQueries.stdout - testsuite/tests/impredicative/T17332.stderr - + testsuite/tests/lib/stm/T26028.hs - + testsuite/tests/lib/stm/T26028.stdout - + testsuite/tests/lib/stm/all.T - testsuite/tests/numeric/should_run/T9810.stdout - testsuite/tests/quantified-constraints/T15290a.stderr - testsuite/tests/quantified-constraints/T19690.stderr - testsuite/tests/quantified-constraints/T19921.stderr - testsuite/tests/quantified-constraints/T21006.stderr - testsuite/tests/roles/should_fail/RolesIArray.stderr - + testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T26115.hs - + testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T26115.stderr - + testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T26116.hs - + testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T26116.stderr - + testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T26117.hs - + testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T26117.stderr - testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/all.T - + testsuite/tests/splice-imports/T26088.stderr - + testsuite/tests/splice-imports/T26088A.hs - + testsuite/tests/splice-imports/T26088B.hs - testsuite/tests/splice-imports/all.T - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T12427a.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T23171.hs - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/TcSpecPragmas.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T14605.hs - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T14605.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T15801.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T18640a.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T18640b.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T19627.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T21530b.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T22912.stderr - testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail174.stderr - utils/haddock/haddock-api/src/Haddock/Interface/Rename.hs The diff was not included because it is too large. View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/59d468c677a9d1f300754f499713a5a... -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/59d468c677a9d1f300754f499713a5a... You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org.