
Indeed, I missed the package-qualifer in findImportedModule. It does look plausible. If there is no recommended/better way to do this sort of thing, I think I'll go for it. If other plugin authors want to share their experience on what worked and didn't for them. I'd love to hear it, too. Seems like a common sort of problems in plugins. /Arnaud On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:41 AM Matthew Pickering < matthewtpickering@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you have a look at the implementation of `findImportedModule`? I think you can use it and set the final argument to `Just "assert-plugin"` so that it only looks for the module in the `assert-plugin` package.
Another way people do this is to use a Template Haskell quote and then use `GhcPlugins.thNameToGhcName`. Which is probably the most robust way of persisting a name between the two stages.
Cheers,
Matt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:31 AM Spiwack, Arnaud
wrote: Dear all,
(first, I don't know if this is the best place for questions/discussions
about the GHC API, if not, let me know where to redirect the conversation).
I've been writing a plugin that substitutes call to a function by calls
to another (it's a plugin reimplementation of the assert feature of GHC). And to be able to point at the names of these two functions, I need to construct a name (well, and OccName) made of three parts: unit id, module name, definition name.
This question is about the unit name. Currently I simply use
stringToUnitId. But the real name of my unit has a magic string in it (see https://github.com/aspiwack/assert-plugin/blob/a538d72581bae43ebf44c332e19c5... ). It's rather unpleasant, it seems to change every time the cabal file change (at least).
The assert-explainer plugin uses another approach, only using the module
name, then calling findImportedModule ( https://github.com/ocharles/assert-explainer/blob/dc6ea213d4d0576954ec883eea... ).
This is much more robust to changes, but is also less precise
(technically, there can be several imported modules with the same name, with package-qualified imports).
So, the question is: is there a better, recommended way to recover the
OccName (or Name!) of a function I defined in the same unit my plugin is defined in.
Best, Arnaud _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs