as long as we clearly communicate that there may be refinements / breaking
changes subsequently, i'm all for it, unless merging it in slows down 7.8
hitting RC . (its taken long enough for RC to happen... don't want to drag
it out further)
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Richard Eisenberg
+1 for inclusion. This is a nicely opt-in feature, and so (barring any regressions) only those intrepid people who want it will be affected.
Richard
On Jan 6, 2014, at 8:17 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.01.2014, 12:42 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton-Jones:
We could put it in the release with warnings saying "the exact details, esp of syntax, might change, but do try it". I'd be ok with that, and we've done it before.
What do other people think?
This feature may be so good that people will use it in, say, released libraries, disregarding the warning.
But it seems that any possible syntax change will only affect those who define pattern synonyms, and not those who use them, and hence only cause work for those disregarding the warning, I’m in favor of inclusion.
Greetings, Joachim
-- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs