Re: Making GHCi awesomer?

Sure, but how often does the API deal with types that aren't defined by `ghc` or `base`? ByteString is one case I can think of, if you want to muck about with FastStrings without the overhead of Strings.

On Oct 20, 2014, at 09:59, Brandon Allbery wrote:

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: How feasible would it be to add this feature to GHC? At a first glance it seems like it would help substantially

Only until you need to hand off data between them, sadly.

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net