Hi *
for what it's worth, I really like the idea. Its purpose is clear, it's
easy to use, it's straightforward to understand, and it seems there are
only benefits that come with it.
I at least would be an immediate user, as it gives a compile-time fence to
custom hard-coded stuff. E.g. it is sometimes simpler and nicer to put
something in a string literal rather than an explicit AST.
(Just my 2 cents -- I'm not a TH expert.)
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Merijn Verstraaten
I've been repeatedly running into problems with overloaded literals and partial conversion functions, so I wrote up an initial proposal ( https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ValidateMonoLiterals) and I'd like to commence with the bikeshedding and hearing other opinions :)
Cheers, Merijn
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
-- Carl Eyeinsky