Re: Summarize #7602

@Andrew, if you have GHC built with a real GCC, theres no perf issue. (though if you built GHC with clang, thereis) I've a bindist thats from the 7.8 branch from 5 days ago that I built wiht GCC-4.8 here https://github.com/cartazio/ghc/releases/tag/carters-build-7.8-preRC1 you may need to patch the settings file to point to your own GCC version point being, no issue if you built with GCC. :) On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Austin Seipp wrote:

TL;DR OS X suffers a performance hit when build with llvm-gcc/clang. The binary builds are built this way. The fix I outlined in the ticket (a fast `pthread_getspecific`/`pthread_setspecific`) could still work to recover most of the performance, but Apple accidentally messed up the Mavericks source code release, so I'm not sure if anything regarding the pthread implementation has changed. If it hasn't, then I think it should be reasonably easy to fix with some testing.

(The ticket is a bit of a long and dry read I'm afraid.)

...

I know that #7602 has been mentioned as a final loose end in the RC. I was wondering if someone in the know could summarize its status in regards to how it effects GHC users.

Feel free to be blisteringly brief... ;-) I'm just looking for things

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Farmer wrote: like:

...

"this is a non-issue on modern OS X/Clang" or "it'll be fixed soon just be patient" or "we've done our part, this is Apple's problem now".

I gave the trac thread a read-through, but there seems to be several degrees of flexibility/workarounds, so I'm still not sure if this is something I should worry about on my OS X machine.

Thanks for your cycles! Andrew

_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

-- Regards,

Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs