My interest is just to get involved somehow in the NCG. Starting a new backend seemed reasonable only because I couldn't break something that didn't exist. ;-) Though cleaning up the NCG would probably be more educational for me. So if that's desired then I'll get involved there. Cheers, Corey -Corey O'Connor coreyoconnor@gmail.com http://corebotllc.com/ On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Carter Schonwald < carter.schonwald@gmail.com> wrote:
I mean next year. I'm hoping to start hacking on it and a few other ncg related tasks early January with about 1-2 evenings of regularly scheduled work on it.
So feel welcome to do a Ppc validate anyways in the mean time :-)
On Sunday, December 22, 2013, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Carter Schonwald wrote:
I believe there are no current plans to add arm to the ncg.
However, I'm hoping to spend a wee bit of time later this year cleaning up
Dude, you have 7 days! Or did you mean next year :-).
the ncg, and one consequence of that that simon marlow remarked upon at icfp is that would perhaps make it easier to add new targets to ncg.
As soon as that NCG cleanup is ready for public consumption, please let me know so I can validate the PowerPC NCG. I think I am one of the few people who regularly builds GHC on PowerPC and even I haven't done it for two weeks because I just moved house.
Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs