Ugh. I validated that patch before committing and validated many times after
that patch. Are you using a 32bit system? Maybe we should bump the numbers for
32bit builds too.
I'm hesitant to mark the test broken because I'm afraid that the numbers will
increase if we stop testing for allocations/residency completely. I think
temporarily bumping numbers is better than temporarily disabling it.
What are the numbers you're getting?
2016-08-17 14:16 GMT+00:00 Matthew Pickering
Hi all,
https://phabricator.haskell.org/rGHC773e3aadac4bbee9a0173ebc90ffdc9458a2a3a9
broke the build by re-enabling the test T1969
The ticket tracking this is: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12437
Omer: Is it best to revert this patch and mark the test broken again?
Matt