Re: Status update on overloaded records work?

That *will* work under Adam's scheme. -Edward On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:41 PM, AntC wrote:

...

- (What I was hoping for but didn't get.) No compiler flag to suppress creating selector functions. This would have allowed records to be declared re-using the same name; but left it entirely to the developer as to how to access them.

Does that mean that this won't work:

module M where

data T1 = C1 { f :: Int } data T2 = C2 { f :: Int }

?

-- Johan

_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs