Re: Shared data type for extension flags

How about ghc-datatypes? ghc-core-data seems like it would have something to do with the Core language and ghc-integration sounds like it is a layer on top of ghc. Using the -types suffix has quite som precedence [1] for packages defining shared datatypes (as does the -core suffix), but given Malcolms comment it is perhaps not a good fit for GHC. [1]: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/search?terms=types Adam Sandberg Eriksson On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, at 05:50 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:28 AM, malcolm.wallace wrote:

...

"ghc-types" sounds like a package for fancy type hackery.  I would never think to find language extension flags in such a place.  How about "ghc-package-db", or "ghc-language-extensions"?

ghc-integration ghc-core-data

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net _________________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs