Oh! I guess the name ghcspeed was too memorable... and browser bar
autocompletion did the rest. Sorry for the noise!
Regards,
Reid Barton
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Joachim Breitner
Dear Reid,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2016, 14:50 -0500 schrieb Reid Barton:
I was interested to see what effect the recent commit "Restore original alignment for info tables" (0dc7b36c) would have on performance. However, when I look at http://ghcspeed-nomeata.rhcloud. com/changes/?rev=0dc7b36c3c261b3eccf8460581fcd3d71f6e6ff6, I don't see the expected binary size increase (about 1%) that I got in local testing. Instead, the size increase appears to be attached to commit 0d92d9cb6d65fd00f9910c3f6f85bc6c68f5543b.
I notice that these two commits, along with three others, were committed at exactly the same time (Wed Jan 27 11:32:15 2016 +0100), presumably in a rebase. Could this be confusing ghcspeed?
heh, I’m surprised: Both that the ghcspeed server still runs, and that people are still using it :-)
Indeed, you observe correctly, ghcspeed does not handle git rebases well. That was one of the reasons why I reimplemented the server from scratch. It now runs under perf.haskell.org, and there the expected changes are attributed to the right commit:
https://perf.haskell.org/ghc/#revision/0dc7b36c3c261b3eccf8460581fcd3d71f6e6...
Is ghcspeed still linked somewhere, or was it an old bookmark from you that led you there?
Greetings, Joachim
-- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs