8 Oct
2018
8 Oct
'18
6:38 p.m.
That is a very good point, thank you! I have not thought about
incremental parsing. That's something I need to research before I
start the rewrite.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:06 AM Alan & Kim Zimmerman
I am not against this proposal, but want to raise a possible future concern.
As part of improving the haskell tooling environment I am keen on making GHC incremental, and have started a proof of concept based in the same techniques as used in the tree-sitter library.
This is achieved by modifying happy, and requires minimal changes to the existing Parser.y.
It would be unfortunate if this possibility was prevented by this rewrite.
Alan