15 Jun
2020
15 Jun
'20
5:06 p.m.
On 15/06/2020 19:50, Ben Gamari wrote:
Frankly, this makes me wonder whether we should change the output produced for loops. The current error is essentially un-Googleable, as we see here. I know I have personally struggled with this same issue in the past.
I wholeheartedly agree with this suggestion. Maybe we could even start a little taxonomy of errors by adding an error code to the message that would be more searchable? Something like E5032?