Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2015, 08:37 +0100 schrieb Herbert Valerio Riedel:
One thing to keep in mind though is that then 'haskeline' (which is needed by GHCi) still remains a consumer of 'transformers', so we'd still have to bundle a 'transformers' package version with GHC even if `ghc` doesn't depend on it anymore. Somewhat related, the `ghc` -> `Cabal` dependency was broken up in GHC 7.10 but we'll still bundle `Cabal` with GHC 7.10.
although there has been talk about only shipping the .so file with a clash-free name or path... was this not done simply because noone bothered enough to actually do it, or was there a bigger problem? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org