Yes there is.
For existing code if anybody has already explicitly hidden it from
Data.Foldable, so they can work with traverse_ from some specific container
type, they'd now get slapped with it on the backswing by Data.Traversable.
import Data.Foldable hiding (traverse_)
import SomeContainer
import Data.Traversable
main = something that used a monomorphic traverse_ from SomeContainer
This is sort of like how users get hammered with Control.Monad methods from
all of the Control.Monad.Foo modules today, where it can be remarkably hard
to hide all the attempts they make to shove the same fail, join, etc. down
your throat.
-Edward
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Christopher Allen
Any reason not to do it? I realize it needs Foldable, but even knowing that I still forget it's in Data.Foldable. Seems like a free UX win to me. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs