Like Richard I use the uniques all the time.
I'd prefer to leave it as-is, unless there is widespread support for a change
S
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-devs On Behalf Of Ömer Sinan
| Agacan
| Sent: 05 October 2018 20:02
| To: rae@cs.brynmawr.edu
| Cc: ghc-devs
| Subject: Re: Shall we make -dsuppress-uniques default?
|
| > What do you say to GHC to get it to print the uniques that you don't
| like?
|
| I usually use one of these: -ddump-simpl, -dverbose-core2core,
| -ddump-simpl-iterations, -ddump-stg. All of these print variables with
| unique
| details and I literally never need those details. Rarely I use -ddump-cmm
| too.
|
| Agreed that having different defaults in different dumps/traces might
| work ..
|
| Ömer
|
| Richard Eisenberg , 5 Eki 2018 Cum, 21:54
| tarihinde şunu yazdı:
| >
| > I'm in the opposite camp. More often than not, the biggest advantage of
| dumps during GHC development is to see the uniques. Indeed, I often
| ignore the actual names of variables and just work in my head with the
| uniques.
| >
| > Perhaps the more complete answer is to fine-tune what settings cause
| the uniques to be printed. -ddump-xx-trace should almost certainly.
| Perhaps other modes needn't. What do you say to GHC to get it to print
| the uniques that you don't like?
| >
| > Richard
| >
| > > On Oct 5, 2018, at 2:48 PM, Ömer Sinan Ağacan
| wrote:
| > >
| > > I asked this on IRC and didn't hear a lot of opposition, so as the
| next step
| > > I'd like to ask ghc-devs.
| > >
| > > I literally never need the details on uniques that we currently print
| by
| > > default. I either don't care about variables too much (when not
| comparing the
| > > output with some other output), or I need -dsuppress-uniques (when
| comparing
| > > outputs). The problem is I have to remember to add -dsuppress-uniques
| if I'm
| > > going to compare the outputs, and if I decide to compare outputs
| after the fact
| > > I need to re-generate them with -dsuppress-uniques. This takes time
| and effort.
| > >
| > > If you're also of the same opinion I suggest making -dsuppress-
| uniques default,
| > > and providing a -dno-suppress-uniques (if it doesn't already exist).
| > >
| > > Ömer
| > > _______________________________________________
| > > ghc-devs mailing list
| > > ghc-devs@haskell.org
| > >
| https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask
| ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-
| devs&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C07ec32bd26d149c457ab08d
| 62af537c9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636743630029759709
| &sdata=4DVsRJ4Burv2%2BZGf38py%2FNRqM5j5%2FJAUkJPrUl7%2F%2Fm0%3D&r
| eserved=0
| >
| _______________________________________________
| ghc-devs mailing list
| ghc-devs@haskell.org
| https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask
| ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-
| devs&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C07ec32bd26d149c457ab08d
| 62af537c9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636743630029759709
| &sdata=4DVsRJ4Burv2%2BZGf38py%2FNRqM5j5%2FJAUkJPrUl7%2F%2Fm0%3D&r
| eserved=0
