That makes perfect sense to me.
-Edward
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Yitzchak Gale
Yuras Shumovich wrote:
Can we generalize the proposal such that subsequent imports shadow preceding ones?
Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
...iirc there is a different idea... allowing explicitly enumerated names... to shadow imports from other modules which didn't explicitly name the same import; effectively introducing a higher-priority scope for names imported explicitly.
Conversely - the original proposal should be modified to remain an error, not a warning, when the symbol was imported explicitly on an import list and then redefined locally at the top level. This is equivalent to defining a symbol twice in the same scope.
Thanks, Yitz _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs