
Here's a question, on top of this one: why don't we require
template-haskell changes for most corresponding syntax changes? We
tend to play catch up with template-haskell sometimes and it's
relatively strange. I mean, in some sense, we could have said a while
back "This needs another revision, please add template haskell
support" and avoided it all.
Richard has a better insight into this than I do, I'm sure, but it
seems - to me, anyway - like template-haskell support is a reasonable
bar for most surface-level syntax change to cross, before getting
merged.
My intuition tells me that, most of the time, a lot of us simply
forget to make the changes, or ask for them in reviews, and so it
goes.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Ben Gamari
Iavor Diatchki
writes: Hello,
Now that "OVERLAPPING" and "OVERLAPPABLE" are pragmas on the instances, do we have a way to generate instances with such pragmas using Template Haskell? I can't seem to find a way to do this, which is unfortunate.
If I am not missing anything, would there be objections to adding it to the TH library before the next release---I would volunteer to do the change ASAP.
Indeed this is an unfortunate gap. Given that this shouldn't be a terribly invasive change I would be alright with this if Richard approves.
Cheers,
- Ben
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/