Dear Simon, Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 11:04 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
The commit message says something about "tick reports", but the change to the code is entirely un-commented, and appears to have nothing to do with ticky reports.
Could you add a comment or Note to explain?
sorry that this happens so often; but this is again just a work-in- progress-commit on a wip branch, and as such not yet in the polished stat required to go to master. This commit makes a bit more sense when seen in conjunction with 30b9061317ea7b834339d9458c46bd6b9108d947 Be more explicit about closure types in ticky-ticky-report which is already in master (and where, upon reading right now, I’m not sure if the current code mkLFReEntrant top fvs args arg_descr = LFReEntrant top os_info (length args) (null fvs) arg_descr where os_info = idOneShotInfo (head args) is really the right away, or whether the idOneShotInfo of all arguments should be used here (I think you said something along these lines, I failed to follow up on it). Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org