No, I did not. You can try it yourself! | -----Original Message----- | From: Edward Z. Yang [mailto:ezyang@cs.stanford.edu] | Sent: 30 October 2014 19:50 | To: Simon Peyton Jones | Cc: ghc-devs | Subject: Re: package hashes | | Hmm. I'm not sure, but the right thing might just be to accept this | new output. But I guess I'm a bit confused, since you probably didn't | change this test-case at all, did you? | | Edward | | Excerpts from Simon Peyton Jones's message of 2014-10-30 08:26:45 - | 0700: | > Edward | > | > On branch wip/new-flatten-skolems-Oct14, I'm getting this test | failure repeatably on test safePkgO1. I'm pretty sure I have done | nothing to mess with package hashes! | > | > Any ideas? | > | > Simon | > | > =====> safePkg01(normal) 108 of 120 [0, 0, 0] | > cd ./check/pkg01 && $MAKE -s --no-print-directory safePkg01 | VANILLA=--enable-library-vanilla PROF=--disable-library-profiling | DYN=--enable-shared safePkg01.run.stdout | 2>safePkg01.run.stderr | > Actual stdout output differs from expected: | > --- ./check/pkg01/safePkg01.stdout 2014-10-29 15:09:16.000000000 | +0000 | > +++ ./check/pkg01/safePkg01.run.stdout 2014-10-30 | 15:25:17.799094762 +0000 | > @@ -29,17 +29,17 @@ | > require own pkg trusted: True | > M_SafePkg6 | > -package dependencies: array-0.5.0.1@array_<HASH> | > +package dependencies: array-0.5.0.1 base-4.8.0.0* | > trusted: trustworthy | > require own pkg trusted: False | > M_SafePkg7 | > -package dependencies: array-0.5.0.1@array_<HASH> | > +package dependencies: array-0.5.0.1 base-4.8.0.0* | > trusted: safe | > require own pkg trusted: False | > M_SafePkg8 | > -package dependencies: array-0.5.0.1@array_<HASH> | > +package dependencies: array-0.5.0.1 base-4.8.0.0 | > trusted: trustworthy | > require own pkg trusted: False