
I'm going to read up on Ian's Buildbot work and experiment with that in the meantime. If other challenges come up I'm glad to dive in and help.
On Apr 1, 2014, at 12:03, Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: Indeed, there is no reason not to use Ian et al's Builder stuff. It's one of the options. But it depends on a critical evaluation of what the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches are
Simon
| -----Original Message----- | From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- | bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Karel Gardas | Sent: 01 April 2014 12:46 | To: Joachim Breitner; ghc-devs@haskell.org; Páli Gábor János | Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Buildbots | | | Hi, | | I'm curious why not to use what's already written by Ian and others and | which is currently running again? E.g. Janos Gabor Pali was so nice to | start and keep builder server running on | http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/builders/ | | Just few are there, but others may be added. Just send email to Janos to | get the credentials and more information about what to get from where | (recent builder client is needed). | | Perhaps we shall more advertise this option on GHC's builder wiki page? | | Thanks, | Karel | | | On 04/ 1/14 01:11 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: | > Hence: Travis is _not_ going to be a solution for us; we will want our | > own infrastructure. | _______________________________________________ | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list | Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs