Hi, Am Dienstag, den 18.04.2017, 22:49 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs:
Thanks Joachim. But rather than giving me a person tutorial every six months, might it not be more efficient to make the web pages self explanatory? Eg by supplying a key, by signalling more clearly that only commits with significant changes are shown etc?
Self-explanatory web-pages would be ideal, and I tried to make it as self-explanatory as my limited UI skills carry me. And before I add documentation (which gets out of date and does not get read anyways), I’d rather refine the UI. The missing commits are already hinted at with the somewhat thick dotted line that replaces then. Maybe it needs to be thicker, and possibly have a tooltip to explain it. Or I should try to recreate how GitHub visually indicates when only part of a diff is shown. Also, I don’t mind explaining it twice a year. This way I at least learn if people are still using the tool :-) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org