
Thanks a lot Vlad and Shayne, that indeed did the trick! Out of curiosity, how could I have figured out that this was the culprit? The parse error I got was a bit puzzling, and I couldn't find any flags that would give more information (I think I was looking for the parser equivalent of -ddump-tc-trace). Best, Csongor
On 29 Aug 2020, at 00:51, Shayne Fletcher
wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:48 PM Shayne Fletcher
mailto:shayne.fletcher.50@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Vladislav Zavialov
mailto:vladislav@serokell.io> wrote: Hi Csongor, I believe the reason for this failure is that a -> @m b gets parsed as a -> @(m b). Why is that? Because a ‘btype’ includes type-level application.
If you replace the ‘btype’ after PREFIX_AT with an ‘atype’, this particular issue should go away. At least that’s my hypothesis, I haven’t tested it.
I confirm that this is correct and with that change the example string reduces as hoped.
- Vlad
Also, with that correction there are no new shift/reduce conflicts. The original rule gave rise to 3.
-- Shayne Fletcher