Indeed, there is no reason not to use Ian et al's Builder stuff. It's one of the options. But it depends on a critical evaluation of what the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches are Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- | bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Karel Gardas | Sent: 01 April 2014 12:46 | To: Joachim Breitner; ghc-devs@haskell.org; Páli Gábor János | Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Buildbots | | | Hi, | | I'm curious why not to use what's already written by Ian and others and | which is currently running again? E.g. Janos Gabor Pali was so nice to | start and keep builder server running on | http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/builders/ | | Just few are there, but others may be added. Just send email to Janos to | get the credentials and more information about what to get from where | (recent builder client is needed). | | Perhaps we shall more advertise this option on GHC's builder wiki page? | | Thanks, | Karel | | | On 04/ 1/14 01:11 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: | > Hence: Travis is _not_ going to be a solution for us; we will want our | > own infrastructure. | _______________________________________________ | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list | Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users