PS: and if we agree this convention can we document it in our Working Conventions pages? S | -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Simon | Peyton Jones | Sent: 14 July 2014 20:25 | To: Richard Eisenberg; ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: RE: Phab vs. Trac | | | Here is my proposed answer: The Phab reviews are a good place for code- | | specific commentary/feedback but Trac is better for design issues. A | rule | | of thumb might be to pretend that Phab comments are all forgotten in a | | month or two, whereas Trac comments are expected to be around in 5 | years. | | Good criterion. I'm littering the Notes in GHC with references to Trac | tickets, on the grounds that those tickets will be permanently available. | Let's not commit to making the Phab stuff permanently available too. (Of | course it may be.) | | Simon | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs