11 May
2015
11 May
'15
8:52 a.m.
Hi Simon, On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:27:58AM +0000, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
Well, no one is actually suggesting that!
But you're just getting it automatically if you're depending e.g. on the libraries A and B, and A depends on C 1.0 and B depends on C 2.0. Currently you can't build this dependency graph, right? And with this proposed feature you will be getting C 1.0 and 2.0 into your binary. Perhaps a even more nasty case is, if you're using a haskell library which wraps a stateful c library, and now you're having multiple versions of the same haskell library operating on the same c library state. Greetings, Daniel